<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Interpretation of &#8220;Several&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several</link>
	<description>A running commentary of occasionally interesting things — from Mike Davidson.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LEWIS		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-547560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LEWIS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-547560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This “word” evokes immense personal anguish (use of quotation marks to emphasise it’s incompetency in contemporary language). I have many strong conceptual disbeliefs linked to this ambiguous topic, all leading to negative realisations. In my opinion this term should be eradicated from all forms of use. Linguistics and life would be much better with its nullification. It is a perfect example of everything wrong in society, resorting to vague deceptive misinformation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This “word” evokes immense personal anguish (use of quotation marks to emphasise it’s incompetency in contemporary language). I have many strong conceptual disbeliefs linked to this ambiguous topic, all leading to negative realisations. In my opinion this term should be eradicated from all forms of use. Linguistics and life would be much better with its nullification. It is a perfect example of everything wrong in society, resorting to vague deceptive misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nelson Bulmash		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-477202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson Bulmash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-477202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When I was in elementary school,  my teachers taught that two made a couple,  three-four represented a few, and several was represented by five- eight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in elementary school,  my teachers taught that two made a couple,  three-four represented a few, and several was represented by five- eight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chrizzle		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-400970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrizzle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 23:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-400970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was taught in school that several is 3 or 4 in quantity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was taught in school that several is 3 or 4 in quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CR		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-88574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-88574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How about we just stop being lazy and count. Ha!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about we just stop being lazy and count. Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: L'rece Morgillo		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-75112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[L'rece Morgillo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 03:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-75112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My most disliked word because of it&#039;s meaning.
Who the hell made up the meaning? This is a common sense issue here... we have words for 2= couple and for 3=few (or more)(or less)..whatever! but ask any kid who hasnt been &#039;told&#039; and they&#039;ll tell you it&#039;s seven (or more) (or less).. ARGH! I&#039;m a teacher.. I can&#039;t stand this word because of it&#039;s dumb ass meaning!  (now breath slowly.. 1 2 3) .. ok i&#039;m back.. lol.. thank you to all those who are agree =)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My most disliked word because of it&#8217;s meaning.<br />
Who the hell made up the meaning? This is a common sense issue here&#8230; we have words for 2= couple and for 3=few (or more)(or less)..whatever! but ask any kid who hasnt been &#8216;told&#8217; and they&#8217;ll tell you it&#8217;s seven (or more) (or less).. ARGH! I&#8217;m a teacher.. I can&#8217;t stand this word because of it&#8217;s dumb ass meaning!  (now breath slowly.. 1 2 3) .. ok i&#8217;m back.. lol.. thank you to all those who are agree =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve N		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-41050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve N]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 08:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Several sounds like seven but probably isn&#039;t because seven is many and definately not a few. 

I&#039;ve heard people say in conversation lately several billion and thats plenty and definitely more than enough.

My personal estimate of several&#039;s value is 26 but I&#039;ve been wrong before.

Thanks, I hope you found this helpful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several sounds like seven but probably isn&#8217;t because seven is many and definately not a few. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard people say in conversation lately several billion and thats plenty and definitely more than enough.</p>
<p>My personal estimate of several&#8217;s value is 26 but I&#8217;ve been wrong before.</p>
<p>Thanks, I hope you found this helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joy M		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-39851</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was always taught:

2 = couple
3 or more = few and, 
7 = several]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was always taught:</p>
<p>2 = couple<br />
3 or more = few and,<br />
7 = several</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-39672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[2 = couple
3 = a few
4-7 = several
8 or more = many]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 = couple<br />
3 = a few<br />
4-7 = several<br />
8 or more = many</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Watson		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-13030</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Watson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13030</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Huh, I was able to get it working in IE.  Strange.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, I was able to get it working in IE.  Strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Rundle		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-13033</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Rundle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13033</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I tried clicking on 147,548 but it wasn&#039;t working, not sure why.  I&#039;m using Safari.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried clicking on 147,548 but it wasn&#8217;t working, not sure why.  I&#8217;m using Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martijn		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-13034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martijn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For me it&#039;s more like &#039;multiple&#039; so that means 2 or more..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it&#8217;s more like &#8216;multiple&#8217; so that means 2 or more..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan Christensen		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-13036</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Christensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For me:

&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;A couple = 2&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;A few = 3&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Several = 4, maybe more&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

.. and so on.. though it sort of depends on the situation. Several is generally a range that can be anywhere between 4 and 6.. perhaps 7. More than that is probably closing in on a &quot;lot&quot;..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me:</p>
<ul>
<li>A couple = 2</li>
<li>A few = 3</li>
<li>Several = 4, maybe more</li>
</ul>
<p>.. and so on.. though it sort of depends on the situation. Several is generally a range that can be anywhere between 4 and 6.. perhaps 7. More than that is probably closing in on a &#8220;lot&#8221;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Smith		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-13039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I said seven, because &quot;seven&quot; sounds like &quot;several&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said seven, because &#8220;seven&#8221; sounds like &#8220;several&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-13040</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with the camp that groups it alongside &#039;couple&#039; and &#039;few&#039;.  Although mine&#039;s more like this (the groups overlap):

couple = 2-3
few = 3-4
several = 4-10 (so I picked 7)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with the camp that groups it alongside &#8216;couple&#8217; and &#8216;few&#8217;.  Although mine&#8217;s more like this (the groups overlap):</p>
<p>couple = 2-3<br />
few = 3-4<br />
several = 4-10 (so I picked 7)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pat		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2006/07/interpretation-of-several#comment-13041</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I always considered &quot;several&quot; to be approximately half of &quot;seven&quot;, since the words look like they&#039;re derived from a common root. Since you&#039;re usually talking about integers, that means 3 or 4.

I used to have a similar uncertainty with &quot;couple&quot;. I was working at a fast food place when I was 17 and this kid (appeared to still be in grade school) asked for a &quot;couple of sodas&quot;. I asked how many exactly and he gave this snide response: &quot;A couple is 2 - me and my wife are a couple.&quot; As if I was the moron for verifying how many sodas he was willing to pay for. The tone of his voice was so grating -- he was clearly quoting some authority figure who&#039;d been just as obnoxious to him.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always considered &#8220;several&#8221; to be approximately half of &#8220;seven&#8221;, since the words look like they&#8217;re derived from a common root. Since you&#8217;re usually talking about integers, that means 3 or 4.</p>
<p>I used to have a similar uncertainty with &#8220;couple&#8221;. I was working at a fast food place when I was 17 and this kid (appeared to still be in grade school) asked for a &#8220;couple of sodas&#8221;. I asked how many exactly and he gave this snide response: &#8220;A couple is 2 &#8211; me and my wife are a couple.&#8221; As if I was the moron for verifying how many sodas he was willing to pay for. The tone of his voice was so grating &#8212; he was clearly quoting some authority figure who&#8217;d been just as obnoxious to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
