<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: April Randoms	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms</link>
	<description>A running commentary of occasionally interesting things — from Mike Davidson.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 06:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Shawn		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just thought Id drop a note that if you like the Pontiac Solstice, I would atleast consider waiting for the Saturn version: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saturn.com/saturn/showroom/future_vehicles/sky.jsp?nav=710&amp;flashOK=yes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.saturn.com/saturn/showroom/future_vehicles/sky.jsp?nav=710&amp;flashOK=yes&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought Id drop a note that if you like the Pontiac Solstice, I would atleast consider waiting for the Saturn version: <a href="http://www.saturn.com/saturn/showroom/future_vehicles/sky.jsp?nav=710&#038;flashOK=yes" rel="nofollow">http://www.saturn.com/saturn/showroom/future_vehicles/sky.jsp?nav=710&#038;flashOK=yes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Archer		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5303</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Archer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As the unfortunate owner of two Chevys, I can vouch for the fact that American cars are pretty much junk.  Design is returning to the American auto industry, but I&#039;m still being Japanese for at least the next decade.  Then maybe I&#039;ll check back to see if GM has cleaned up their act.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the unfortunate owner of two Chevys, I can vouch for the fact that American cars are pretty much junk.  Design is returning to the American auto industry, but I&#8217;m still being Japanese for at least the next decade.  Then maybe I&#8217;ll check back to see if GM has cleaned up their act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5304</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pontiac has been building crappy, unsellable cars for so long that it&#039;s hard for me to believe that it isn&#039;t some of front for the mob. They have clearly cornered the market on poor design and even worse quality. So while the Solstice might look like a sweet machine on their website, I&#039;d still be very skeptical.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pontiac has been building crappy, unsellable cars for so long that it&#8217;s hard for me to believe that it isn&#8217;t some of front for the mob. They have clearly cornered the market on poor design and even worse quality. So while the Solstice might look like a sweet machine on their website, I&#8217;d still be very skeptical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: B. Adam		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5305</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B. Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;James&lt;/strong&gt;: I feel the need to jump in right quick and defend American ingenuity and my 2004 Ford Focus. I love it -- it&#039;s simple, no frills, straight-forward design fits me perfectly and (as far as I know) &lt;em&gt;most of it&lt;/em&gt; was at least made right here in the good old USofA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>James</strong>: I feel the need to jump in right quick and defend American ingenuity and my 2004 Ford Focus. I love it &#8212; it&#8217;s simple, no frills, straight-forward design fits me perfectly and (as far as I know) <em>most of it</em> was at least made right here in the good old USofA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremy		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5306</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Adam wrote: I feel the need to jump in right quick and defend American ingenuity and my 2004 Ford Focus.

The current design of the Ford Focus was originally launched in Europe, then brought to the US based on that success. So that American ingenuity came in the form of a German design team...
(It&#039;s a pity Ford isn&#039;t doing the same with the current European Focus, as it&#039;s been a hugely successful redesign. The official line is that &quot;Americans don&#039;t go for the European engineering.&quot;) 

As far as being built here in the US, so are the vast majority of Toyotas and Hondas. (However, Toyota&#039;s Scion line is currently all import, as is most of the Lexus brand, though I believe there&#039;s RX400 production in Canada for a couple of years now).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam wrote: I feel the need to jump in right quick and defend American ingenuity and my 2004 Ford Focus.</p>
<p>The current design of the Ford Focus was originally launched in Europe, then brought to the US based on that success. So that American ingenuity came in the form of a German design team&#8230;<br />
(It&#8217;s a pity Ford isn&#8217;t doing the same with the current European Focus, as it&#8217;s been a hugely successful redesign. The official line is that &#8220;Americans don&#8217;t go for the European engineering.&#8221;) </p>
<p>As far as being built here in the US, so are the vast majority of Toyotas and Hondas. (However, Toyota&#8217;s Scion line is currently all import, as is most of the Lexus brand, though I believe there&#8217;s RX400 production in Canada for a couple of years now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5307</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;jason3d says: When I heard they were bringing back the GTO I was looking forward to something that would look like a muscle car. Boy was I disappointed. How long are they going to keep churning out that Grand Am/Prix/Bonneville body style?? They all look alike!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know I&#039;m straying from the topic at hand but I have to defend the GTO here.  The GTO is a Pontiac-badged Holden Monaro, made in Australia.  It was not developed alongside the Grand Am/Prix/Bonneville.  It was, in fact, based on elements of the Holden Commodore.  Much better looking, in my humble opinion, than anything else Pontiac has attempted in the last... forever.  Although they still somehow made the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dieselstation.com/wallpapers/Holden-Monaro/Holden-Monaro-002.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Monaro&lt;/a&gt; look worse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>jason3d says: When I heard they were bringing back the GTO I was looking forward to something that would look like a muscle car. Boy was I disappointed. How long are they going to keep churning out that Grand Am/Prix/Bonneville body style?? They all look alike!</p></blockquote>
<p>I know I&#8217;m straying from the topic at hand but I have to defend the GTO here.  The GTO is a Pontiac-badged Holden Monaro, made in Australia.  It was not developed alongside the Grand Am/Prix/Bonneville.  It was, in fact, based on elements of the Holden Commodore.  Much better looking, in my humble opinion, than anything else Pontiac has attempted in the last&#8230; forever.  Although they still somehow made the <a href="http://www.dieselstation.com/wallpapers/Holden-Monaro/Holden-Monaro-002.jpg" rel="nofollow">Monaro</a> look worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason3d		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason3d]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[B. Adam: My first new car was a 2001 Ford Focus. I loved it... until the warranty was up. Up to that point it was perfect and I had babied it, hell it was my first new car.  Within 60 days of the end of the warranty I had 3 power window units break, the front breaks went and had to be replaced (not just pads), the breaks went bad so fast (on the way to the shop), it messed up other things, map sensor, and about 5 other things that I can&#039;t even remember.

After rounds and rounds of phone calls with the dealer about how all this could happen right when the warranty ends the best I could get from him was a $450 &#039;Warranty Adjustment&#039; I still ended up paying almost $2,300 for repairs that would have mostly been covered 60days prior. I dumped the Focus for the Vibe and never looked back. I doubt I&#039;ll ever buy a Ford again.

FYI you may want to keep an eye on the breaks. You know how breaks used to squeak when they need new pads? According to the break shop Ford has designed their breaks not to do that. I guess it&#039;s a bit of aluminum that makes it squeak. So with Fords you don&#039;t get any indication your breaks need attention, they just go. Breaks were fine one day next day as we drove it started to sound like our tires were wobbling, drove it to the shop and by the time we got there it sounded like we were driving on a flat.

Sorry for the rant, I&#039;d just hate to see you get burned like I did. Maybe the 04 is fine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B. Adam: My first new car was a 2001 Ford Focus. I loved it&#8230; until the warranty was up. Up to that point it was perfect and I had babied it, hell it was my first new car.  Within 60 days of the end of the warranty I had 3 power window units break, the front breaks went and had to be replaced (not just pads), the breaks went bad so fast (on the way to the shop), it messed up other things, map sensor, and about 5 other things that I can&#8217;t even remember.</p>
<p>After rounds and rounds of phone calls with the dealer about how all this could happen right when the warranty ends the best I could get from him was a $450 &#8216;Warranty Adjustment&#8217; I still ended up paying almost $2,300 for repairs that would have mostly been covered 60days prior. I dumped the Focus for the Vibe and never looked back. I doubt I&#8217;ll ever buy a Ford again.</p>
<p>FYI you may want to keep an eye on the breaks. You know how breaks used to squeak when they need new pads? According to the break shop Ford has designed their breaks not to do that. I guess it&#8217;s a bit of aluminum that makes it squeak. So with Fords you don&#8217;t get any indication your breaks need attention, they just go. Breaks were fine one day next day as we drove it started to sound like our tires were wobbling, drove it to the shop and by the time we got there it sounded like we were driving on a flat.</p>
<p>Sorry for the rant, I&#8217;d just hate to see you get burned like I did. Maybe the 04 is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jeremy		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5309</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The GTO is a Pontiac-badged Holden Monaro, made in Australia.
Ironic isn&#039;t it, that a car considered an icon of American cars is imported. Though the 2008 redesign of the GTO is slated for US productio in addition to Holden.

Jason - the Focus set records for the number of recalls on the 2000 and 2001 models. It got better, but as of the 2003 model, there were still issues, particularly with water leaks in the passenger cabin (a fact I learned the hard way with a rental...).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GTO is a Pontiac-badged Holden Monaro, made in Australia.<br />
Ironic isn&#8217;t it, that a car considered an icon of American cars is imported. Though the 2008 redesign of the GTO is slated for US productio in addition to Holden.</p>
<p>Jason &#8211; the Focus set records for the number of recalls on the 2000 and 2001 models. It got better, but as of the 2003 model, there were still issues, particularly with water leaks in the passenger cabin (a fact I learned the hard way with a rental&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: B. Adam		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B. Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Jeremy&lt;/strong&gt;: Hehe, that&#039;s why I hedged my bet with &quot;as far as I know&quot; -- I knew somebody knew more about it than I did!

&lt;strong&gt;Jason3d&lt;/strong&gt;: Thanks for the heads up -- I will have to pay attention to that. I made sure my warranty lasted as long as my payments, so I&#039;ll keep my fingers crossed and hope for the best in a few years :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jeremy</strong>: Hehe, that&#8217;s why I hedged my bet with &#8220;as far as I know&#8221; &#8212; I knew somebody knew more about it than I did!</p>
<p><strong>Jason3d</strong>: Thanks for the heads up &#8212; I will have to pay attention to that. I made sure my warranty lasted as long as my payments, so I&#8217;ll keep my fingers crossed and hope for the best in a few years :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Su		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5311</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Su]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aaaand, more logos:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lalogotheque.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;La Logotheque&lt;/a&gt; also has flags. The logos are mysteriously accessibly only through the &quot;alphabetic search&quot; near top. There doesn&#039;t seem to be anyway to get at them through the actual navbar.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/logos/logoteam.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hockey Logos&lt;/a&gt;. No vector downloads, but decent-size images that are generally clear enough you can get a good trace off them if you need to.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allthelogos.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AllTheLogos.com&lt;/a&gt; charges a fee for the manual processing of e-mailing a logo to you. Um...&#039;kay. But if you can&#039;t find it anywhere else, I suppose.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aerosite.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aerosite.net&lt;/a&gt; has airline logos, plan specs and livery designs. No downloads, unfortunately, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever come across this stuff anywhere else.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaand, more logos:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lalogotheque.com/" rel="nofollow">La Logotheque</a> also has flags. The logos are mysteriously accessibly only through the &#8220;alphabetic search&#8221; near top. There doesn&#8217;t seem to be anyway to get at them through the actual navbar.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/logos/logoteam.html" rel="nofollow">Hockey Logos</a>. No vector downloads, but decent-size images that are generally clear enough you can get a good trace off them if you need to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.allthelogos.com/" rel="nofollow">AllTheLogos.com</a> charges a fee for the manual processing of e-mailing a logo to you. Um&#8230;&#8217;kay. But if you can&#8217;t find it anywhere else, I suppose.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aerosite.net/" rel="nofollow">Aerosite.net</a> has airline logos, plan specs and livery designs. No downloads, unfortunately, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever come across this stuff anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Creford		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Creford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interestingly, those are great and site. Thanks for informative and excellent posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, those are great and site. Thanks for informative and excellent posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucian		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regarding the incomplete design (mostly blogs), I am currently in the midst of doing exactly just that. If content is king (and I believe for most blogs it is such), a break in content disappoints readers. Given the non-paying nature of most blogs, redesigns are easily sidelined by paying gigs, extending the break in content (ie. more readers lost).

While proper design processes are ideal, blogs have allowed a design-on-the-fly which is a refreshing change from paying work. Readers feel involved in the process and constant feedback sometimes yields very interesting and practical perspectives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the incomplete design (mostly blogs), I am currently in the midst of doing exactly just that. If content is king (and I believe for most blogs it is such), a break in content disappoints readers. Given the non-paying nature of most blogs, redesigns are easily sidelined by paying gigs, extending the break in content (ie. more readers lost).</p>
<p>While proper design processes are ideal, blogs have allowed a design-on-the-fly which is a refreshing change from paying work. Readers feel involved in the process and constant feedback sometimes yields very interesting and practical perspectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JPrime		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JPrime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I personally can&#039;t wait to begin using contentEditable on some of my projects. I&#039;ve always loved how it works in PC IE, and now finally Mac users can use it too. Firefox, where are you?&lt;/i&gt;

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://mozile.mozdev.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mozile&lt;/a&gt; extension for Firefox is their answer I think. It uses methods more in-line with the direction that the W3C is heading for denoting editable areas using CSS attributes (at this point, Mozilla-only versions of &#039;user-modify&#039;, &#039;user-input&#039; and &#039;user-select&#039;).

It outputs valid XHTML and also seems have a more streamlined way of submitting the data directly through a POST, webDAV connection or ontp a local drive. No need to script a transfer between your editable area and a hidden form field! Yay!

The only downside I can see is that it is Gecko-specific. But I remember another company that introduced a non-standard attribute called &#039;contentEditable&#039; that only worked in their browser and now everyone wants to use it. :P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I personally can&#8217;t wait to begin using contentEditable on some of my projects. I&#8217;ve always loved how it works in PC IE, and now finally Mac users can use it too. Firefox, where are you?</i></p>
<p>The <a href="http://mozile.mozdev.org/" rel="nofollow">Mozile</a> extension for Firefox is their answer I think. It uses methods more in-line with the direction that the W3C is heading for denoting editable areas using CSS attributes (at this point, Mozilla-only versions of &#8216;user-modify&#8217;, &#8216;user-input&#8217; and &#8216;user-select&#8217;).</p>
<p>It outputs valid XHTML and also seems have a more streamlined way of submitting the data directly through a POST, webDAV connection or ontp a local drive. No need to script a transfer between your editable area and a hidden form field! Yay!</p>
<p>The only downside I can see is that it is Gecko-specific. But I remember another company that introduced a non-standard attribute called &#8216;contentEditable&#8217; that only worked in their browser and now everyone wants to use it. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never seen anybody older&#039;n 20 behind the wheel of a Pontiac, and I&#039;ve never seen a Pontiac driver show any regard for the people around them. Often, they&#039;re &quot;OMFG TOTAL-E PIMPD OUT LOLZXORS!&quot; with stickers. I know I&#039;m showing irrational prejudice, but that&#039;s just how I see &#039;em.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen anybody older&#8217;n 20 behind the wheel of a Pontiac, and I&#8217;ve never seen a Pontiac driver show any regard for the people around them. Often, they&#8217;re &#8220;OMFG TOTAL-E PIMPD OUT LOLZXORS!&#8221; with stickers. I know I&#8217;m showing irrational prejudice, but that&#8217;s just how I see &#8217;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nowforevermine		</title>
		<link>https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/04/april-randoms#comment-5320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nowforevermine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Spring Cleaning&lt;/strong&gt;

I wanted to do something like Mike Davidson did before I even read his blog this morning, but nonetheless, I wanted to combine a few topics together in one post....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Spring Cleaning</strong></p>
<p>I wanted to do something like Mike Davidson did before I even read his blog this morning, but nonetheless, I wanted to combine a few topics together in one post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
