Comments on: sIFR 2.0 Is Almost Ready… Please Test https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases A running commentary of occasionally interesting things — from Mike Davidson. Thu, 26 May 2016 06:34:37 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Mark Wubben https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4188 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4188 If you do indeed experience anything out of the ordinary, please clearly describe what you see. If necessary provide a screen shot. We would also appreciate it if you could check for JavaScript errors and the such.

And finally, of course, we’d like to know on which OS and with which browser version the problem occured.

Thanks!

]]> By: Mark Wubben https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4189 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4189 And in general, could you contact us to let us know in which browsers the tests succeeded? That way we’ll have an overview of what has been tested and what not. I’ll update the wiki if there are sufficient reports for specific browsers.

Thanks!

(Mike, could you update the post with this stuff? Thanks)

]]> By: Adam Slagle https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4190 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4190 Looks good in Firefox 1.0.2 – both HTML and XHTML.

]]> By: Daniel Sholler https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4191 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4191 It looks fine in Opera 7.54

]]> By: Nic Rodgers https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4192 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4192 Working fine in IE/Win 5.0 – has recovered from the hidden text problem with RC4.

]]> By: Justin W https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4193 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4193 This may be a bit off topic because I’m running a slightly older version of sIFR on one of my client’s sites, but I just havn’t had time to update it and I’m wondering if its the sIFR version thats really the problem or an error on my part. If you look at http://studentsagainstterrorism.org/board.htm in Firefox, you’ll see that the “General Board” header is much larger than it should be, and is much larger than the same header above (the “Executive Board” header). So is this my error or do I just need an upgraded version?

Thanks!

]]> By: Adam M. https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4194 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4194 I’m seeing something in full-page.html that I don’t think is really sIFR-related.

With sIFR both on and off, one headline contains garbage characters:

%HELVETICA, & ARIAL IN & ” GROTESQUE + ACCIDENT

The garbage text doesn’t appear in full-page.xhtml.

New version seems faster in Opera! Looks good in Opera 8.0b3, with transparency working a-OK.

]]> By: Adam M. https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4195 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4195 Justin: Can’t give you any advice on your problem, but very nice design you did there. :-)

]]> By: Urban Faubion https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4196 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4196 Adam, the “garbage characters” are in the xhtml and html source.

Looks good in OS X 10.3.8 Firefox 1.0.2

]]> By: Mark Wubben https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4197 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4197 Adam, yeah, those are characters in the document. Also the XHTML version of full-page is not the same as the HTML one, nor are they the same as the demo one you can find here. They are just the test demos I use.

]]> By: Mike https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4198 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4198 Mac OS X 10.3.8/Flash 7 – All .html tests passed. .xhtml pages did not display sIFR at all but I’m not sure if this is a Safari limitation or not.

]]> By: Mark Wubben https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4199 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4199 Mike, nope, this is intentional. We are relying on a hack which shouldn’t work in Safari in XHTML mode, so until we no longer have to use this hack we’ll prevent Safari in XHTML mode from rendering sIFR.

By the way, you can now also find me on the #sifr channel on irc.freenode.net. (That is, if I’m online.)

]]> By: Kara Pastour https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4200 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4200 Just updated to Firefox vs. 1.0.2 – noticing trouble with the long-uri.html page. sIFR link does indicate an active link, but click-through goes to the same url but with this extension:
http://tests.novemberborn.net/sifr/
long-uri-000.html

Guess I’m not sure what it should be resolving to. That’s the only thing I’ve noticed – all other pages seem to be working fine. :) Kara

p.s running Windows 2000 (yikes, i know!)

]]> By: Mark Wubben https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4201 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4201 Kara, cool, it worked! I originally wanted to add those zeros as a fragment identifier, but that didn’t work. So I created a new file. Only downside is that it messes up the statistics for my site: it creates scrollbars from here to Tokyo!

]]> By: Sanim https://mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/03/sifr-2-0-testcases#comment-4202 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-4202 I would test it out, but I do not have Flash, so sadly, I cannot use sIFR.

]]>